Description of "Good"and"Bad" websites

 !Declaration! This is a page made just for the purpose of classwork


Good websites:

* instructive and fact-based, even if they express a certain point of view (e.g., UNESCO, World Health Organisation, OECD).

* supported by well-known or reputable individuals.

* open in terms of who generated them.

* more likely to provide useful, public-spirited information

* Resources or services that are likely to be beneficial are provided 


Bad websites:

* are not descriptive.

* Provide no citations. 

* contain suspicious characteristics.

* Include visuals that appear to be fabricated or questionable.

* are not regularly updated.

* have a large number of broken or faulty links.

* are one-sided and fail to consider things from different angles.

* might be personal, opinionated blogs.

* include links to dubious websites that are known to be biased or to have hidden intentions.


Kaho

Comments